Subject	120mph (on a deserted highway?) = "stunt"? Are you saying
Posted by	Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) on March 14, 2006 at 11:02 AM
	This message has been viewed 27 times.
In Reply To	And what track are you performing this analysis at? Surely posted by Dave N on March 14, 2006 at 09:23 AM
Message	you've never taken your car up to that speed (or beyond), ever? Not sure what you think the big deal is. Z-Jay Vice President - Edmonton Z Car Club 93 300ZX TT - Stage VI
Follow Ups	Stage 3 40-120 time - red300zxtt 23:36:27 03/13/06 cool, I'll try to post mine too in the next week or two. - maglito 00:14:25 03/14/06 yep, 12 seconds flat - red300zxtt 00:20:13 03/14/06 i am building my dongle from Zcontrol later this week - maglito 00:35:27 03/14/06 huh? - Spee 00:40:48 03/14/06 read it all - maglito 00:48:29 03/14/06 lol, that changes nothing. - Spee 00:51:36 03/14/06 ok (n/m) - maglito 00:55:25 03/14/06 I knew you'd see it my way. (n/m) - Spee 01:16:08 03/14/06 hopefully the creator of datascan will modify his program - red300zxtt 00:41:19 03/14/06 not sure I agree on 50-100 since as it is not as full - maglito 00:58:16 03/14/06 really? - red300zxtt 01:02:11 03/14/06 I agree 100 is good for the top, but it might be nice - maglito 01:08:49 03/14/06 well that's the whole point to eliminate spool variable - red300zxtt 01:18:29 03/14/06 I prefer a more complete picture of how the vehicle perfroms (n/m) - maglito 02:06:37 03/14/06 I don't believe that is suitable for this test - red300zxtt 02:14:42 03/14/06 lol - Kenny 00:44:50 03/14/06 you and Spee need to give it a break already. - maglito 00:49:02 03/14/06 lol - Kenny 00:51:48 03/14/06 I guess you'll just have to wait and see then, sorry man. (n/m) - maglito 00:55:07 03/14/06 ROFL, there's nothing to wait and see. - Kenny 01:07:38 03/14/06 ok (n/m) - maglito 01:09:20 03/14/06 Submission accepted. (n/m) - Kenny 01:10:56 03/14/06 And your driving impressions as of now? - EricTTZ 00:21:20 03/14/06 ask me again in a week - maglito 00:37:22 03/14/06 and the point of this would be...? (n/m) - Spee 00:22:51 03/14/06 From what I read, it looks like he wants others to post - lakerdude42 00:25:13 03/14/06 Thank you, Columbo. - Spee 00:26:02 03/14/06 OH dang me stoopid , dank you fur cleering dat up for me (n/m) - lakerdude42 00:33:39 03/14/06 don't mind him, he's just thread crapping =) (n/m) - red300zxtt 00:44:53 03/14/06 so that you'd ask... (n/m) - red300zxtt 00:25:49 03/14/06 false....try again. - Spee 00:37:25 03/14/06 I have nothing to argue about, it appears that you do (n/m) - red300zxtt 00:44:12 03/14/06 not really... - Spee 00:47:17 03/14/06 And what track are you performing this analysis at? Surely - Dave N 09:23:32 03/14/06 120mph (on a deserted highway?) = "stunt"? Are you saying - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 11:02:16 03/14/06 You're missing the point...I'll be the last one to claim - Dave N 12:43:19 03/14/06 'those' people can enjoy burning $85 a pop at the dyno (n/m) - red300zxtt 12:49:27 03/14/06 BTW - how can you claim being at Stage III with no ECU - Dave N 12:53:31 03/14/06 I have an ECU upgrade, forgot to put it in the profile.. - red300zxtt 12:59:15 03/14/06 If you don't like it, don't participate - red300zxtt 11:48:09 03/14/06 What's so irrelevant about the stopwatch comment? - Dave N 12:29:35 03/14/06 thank you captain obvious - red300zxtt 12:46:55 03/14/06 When you're ready to have an adult-level conversation... - Dave N 12:48:34 03/14/06 clearly you're against speeding on a deserted highway - red300zxtt 12:53:26 03/14/06 Sweet (n/m) - outazway 11:17:11 03/14/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.